博客
关于我
强烈建议你试试无所不能的chatGPT,快点击我
MicroStrategy Business Objects Cognos comparision
阅读量:4209 次
发布时间:2019-05-26

本文共 2017 字,大约阅读时间需要 6 分钟。

Single Metadata – Object definition is stored in a database (called metadata), How easy is changes to be integrated made from one interface to another.

64 Bit support – 32 bit system can’t address more than 4 GB of system space. All non-Windows OS are available in 64 bit for ages. Windows also got it in June 2005, but BI vendor should be able to support 64 bit OS.Scalability – Any calculation performed in database is the best and fast and let very small load on the BI architecture. But not all BI vendors let it happen.

Reusable Objects – Make once use zillion times.Objects Version Control – Ability to have different version of same (schema) objects.

WYSIWYG – Look and feel of what you created and finally how it looks.Security – Object, User security.

Personalization – Single report but show different output to different users.

Manual fine-tuning SQL – Easily making changes to generated SQL.Ease of SQL Generation – Make Schema object and system and forget about the right SQL generation.

MS Office integration – Run report directly from Word, Excel or Powerpoint.

(There is some bug with HTML parser on Blogger.com. Please scroll down for the comparison table. Do write into your comments. I’d update/add more information accordingly)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MicroStrategy

 

Business Objects

 

Cognos

 

 

Single Metadata

 

Yes

 

No

 

No

 

 

64 Bit support

 

Very Good

 

Good

 

Good

 

 

Scalability

 

Excellent

 

Good

 

Very Good

 

 

Reusable bjects

 

Excellent

 

Good

 

Good

 

 

Objects Version Control

 

Very Bad

 

Excellent

 

Very Good

 

 

WYSIWYG

 

Very Good

 

Very Good

 

Very Good

 

 

Security

 

Very Good

 

Good

 

Very Good

 

 

Personalization

 

Very Good

 

Good

 

Bad

 

 

Manual fine-tuning SQL

 

Good

 

Excellent

 

Excellent

 

 

Ease of SQL generation

 

Excellent

 

Very Good

 

Very Good

 

 

MS Office integration

 

Very Good

 

Bad

 

Good

 

 

Learning Curve

 

Bad

 

Very Good

 

Very Good

 

 

Number of Clients

 

10000

 

42000

 

23000

 

 

Number of Employees

 

2000

 

NA

 

3500

 

 

Cost of License

 

$$$$$

 

$$

 

$$$

 

 

Support Cost

 

$$$$$

 

$$$

 

$$$

 

 

Average Pay (USD)##

 

83000

 

78000

 

79000

 

 

Job Security

 

Good

 

Excellent

 

Very Good

 

 

Cost of License

 

$$$$$

 

$$

 

$$$

 

 

Support Cost

 

$$$$$

 

$$$

 

$$$

转载地址:http://fprli.baihongyu.com/

你可能感兴趣的文章
0115 springboot template方式操作mongodb
查看>>
0116 spring的webFlux
查看>>
0121 spring-boot-redis的使用
查看>>
面试刷题24:介绍一枚 JAVA妹妹?
查看>>
面试刷题25:jvm的垃圾收集算法?
查看>>
面试刷题mysql1:一条sql语句是如何经过mysql的体系结构的?
查看>>
mysql之日志
查看>>
面试刷题26:新冠攻击人类?什么攻击java平台?
查看>>
面试刷题27:程序员如何防护java界的新冠肺炎?
查看>>
面试刷题28:如何写出安全的java代码?
查看>>
面试刷题29:mysql事务隔离实现原理?
查看>>
面试刷题30:SpringBean的生命周期?
查看>>
面试刷题31:分布式ID设计方案
查看>>
面试刷题32:你对tomcat做了哪些性能调优?
查看>>
面试刷题33:如何应对高并发?
查看>>
面试刷题34:说一下分布式架构中的缓存使用场景?
查看>>
kafka的基本体系结构
查看>>
如何保证kafka消息不丢失
查看>>
Struts 2 文件上传
查看>>
创建flex的web工程的方法(总结)
查看>>